Scenario 01
If your team has strong React web developers and wants to share code with the web app…
React Native lets you reuse TypeScript types, domain logic and familiar patterns.
Comparison: React Native (New Architecture) vs. Flutter (Impeller)
An assessment of React Native with the New Architecture against Flutter with the Impeller renderer, for teams choosing a cross-platform mobile stack.
Decision framework
Scenario 01
React Native lets you reuse TypeScript types, domain logic and familiar patterns.
Scenario 02
Flutter draws every pixel itself, so the UI looks the same everywhere.
Trade-offs
How the two options compare on the dimensions that usually decide this choice.
| Dimension | React Native (New Architecture) | Flutter (Impeller) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code sharing with web | High: TypeScript types, hooks and business logic carry over from React web | Low: Dart is rarely used on the web, so UI code is separate | React Native suits teams already on React |
| Rendering | Native platform UI components through JSI and Fabric | Its own rendering engine (Impeller) draws every pixel | Flutter gives pixel-identical UI across platforms |
| Hiring | A large JavaScript and React talent pool | A smaller, specialized Dart and Flutter community | React Native is easier to hire for |
Questions
Not with the New Architecture. Fabric and TurboModules let JavaScript call native code through JSI instead of serializing messages over the old asynchronous bridge.
Both add a runtime — the Flutter engine, or Hermes plus the React Native runtime — so even a minimal app is several megabytes. Beyond that, size depends on your assets and native dependencies, so compare release builds of a small prototype.
Share your constraints — team, traffic, budget, compliance. We'll reply within one business day, and the call is about your decision, not our preferred stack.