Driver 01
Paying for two platforms
Separate CI subscriptions on top of the GitHub plan you already pay for.
Migration playbook: Travis CI / CircleCI → GitHub Actions
Consolidate CI in GitHub Actions to remove a separate CI vendor and keep build results next to the pull request.
Migration drivers
Driver 01
Separate CI subscriptions on top of the GitHub plan you already pay for.
Driver 02
Developers leaving the pull request to find failed build logs in another dashboard.
Driver 03
Lag between a GitHub pull request and the third-party build starting.
Execution sequence
Each phase ends with a check you can verify — data parity, error rates, latency — and the rollback path is agreed before any traffic moves.
Converting CircleCI orbs and Travis steps into modular GitHub Actions workflows.
Moving CI credentials to GitHub secrets and using OIDC for cloud deployments.
Splitting long test suites across parallel runners with dependency caching.
Requiring the new checks in branch protection rules before merge.
Risk prevention
Risk 01
Not hashing lockfiles in actions/cache keys, which causes stale dependencies or cache misses.
Risk 02
Granting GITHUB_TOKEN write access on pull requests from forks.
Risk 03
Running the whole CI suite on every commit instead of filtering jobs by changed paths.
Before and after
We take a baseline before any change and report the same numbers after cutover, from your own tools. They are the evidence of whether the migration worked — not figures promised in advance.
Questions
Yes. Path filters (for example dorny/paths-filter) combined with Turborepo or Nx remote caching mean each pull request only builds and tests the packages it touches.
Yes. GitHub Actions supports self-hosted ephemeral runners that scale on AWS or Kubernetes for CPU-heavy builds.
Tell us about your data volume, traffic and timeline. An engineer will reply within one business day to set up a call about the migration plan and its rollback path.